September Experiment:Tracking QR Code Strategy

I’m going to run an experiment through the month of September, whereby I’ll be scanning every QR code I come across (…and remember to scan). I’ll then be reporting on how well strategized the group of QR codes ends up being – where they point to, how user friendly it is, how much value it provides, etc.

Why?

While much of the criticism of QR codes has been on adoption rates (which is entirely valid by the way!) not enough people are highlighting the fact that, in my opinion, the QR killer will be the lack of strategy that marketers have been putting behind their use.

If we get over the adoption hurdle (which is a simple and common process that happens with most technology), it wont matter if users aren’t getting value out of the QR codes themselves, they’ll stop scanning altogether…it won’t be worth it to keep going.

I’ll take a few more opportunities this month to talk QR strategy.

My Definition of Digital Activism

I was asked recently in an exercise to write on a small piece of paper what I know about digital activism.  In an effort of conciseness, I developed the following equation for what factors go into a successful occurrence of digital activism.  Keep in mind, these are also organized based on the order in which they would – or should – happen, although the process can happen so quickly that it can be difficult to make the distinction between them.

Circumstance: There is a certain situation or problem whereby an individual, a group or an organization seeks to have their voice heard or their problem solved.  An example could be a repressive situation, a crisis, or a specific political cause.

Goals: From this circumstance and desire for a greater share-of-voice come the goals of the individual, group or organization identifies the goals or solutions to their situation/problem. What do they ultimately hope to achieve? It’s at this point that the circumstances  are such that someone or a group of people decide they’re going to take action.

Strategy: As expected, once you’ve established your goals, most of the successful campaigns have a big-picture strategy that was developed during the process.

Technology: Once the above landscape is made clearer, a digital technology or technologies are identified as being the most useful and capable to implement.  This decision can be made base don various factors: what’s used most, what infrastructure is in place, what level of “reach” the tool has, etc.

Tactics: This is when you get down to the detailed way in which you’re going to use the technologies/technologies to get to your end goal.

It’s important to note in this model where the technology decision is made.  The thing is, this isn’t always how instances of digital activism come about.  Sometimes it’s a mix of all of these at once, sometimes it seems like things “transpire” organically because there’s a certain technology available.

However, at some level (whether the process seems organic or not), this choice of tool comes after some assessment of the landscape and identification of the problem and development of goals, and after the decision is made to take action.

Digital Organizations: The good and the bad – input welcome!

I’m prepping for a strategy session this weekend in DC to develop a strategy for a new organization that focuses on analyzing the deeper issues around digital activism.  As such, we’ll be discussing at length the structure of the organization: a digital organization.

For the most part, none of us are in the same city at the same time, and we’ll be doing much of our work… well…digitally.  This is quite fitting, but each of the five people attending the strategy meeting have been in digital organizations before, and we’ve seen both the benefits and the perils.

I’m piecing together my Ignite Talk on the subject, and I’ll be focusing specifically on both the positives and negatives of leading a digital organization.

I’ll be posting up my presentation in a few days, but would love your input based on your experience of working in mostly virtual situations.

Strategy Talk: Turning excitement into commitment

[Sidenote: this is not my rant post. I'll get that up tomorrow]

I had a quick thought on building a strategy for an organization or a company.  I’m going to be involved in putting together the long-term strategy of one of the organizations that I’m involved in.  We’ve been lucky enough to have a DC-area think tank ask us to come in, and they’ll give us a weekend full of strategy consulting.

In preparation for the session, I was thinking about some of the major things I’d like to accomplish. One big thing for me, which has been an issue in several arenas, is how to not only get people excited about your mission/vision/goals etc, but how to communicate that in a way that ensures continual excitement and, most importantly, long-term commitment.

I’ve found that it’s very easy for people to get swept up in some of the initial momentum of an organization that they feel strongly about.  But in a lot of cases, while that feeling might have initially resulted in action, it slowly diminishes after a few months or so.  It makes it difficult to build teams that will effectively drive things forward for the long-haul.

I would love to hear of anyone else’s experiences in situations like this, and what solutions they might have.  Any piece of advice helps in these sorts of things…..

Strategy Magazine: Top 5 Tips for Entrepreneurs

Having been part of one failed start-up and having seen many start-ups fail around me, I’ve compiled a decent list of “what not to do” items. The following post in Strategy Magazine highlights those.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Feed me!

What I thought

Check out our book release!




Obviously you were wondering what time it was....

A barrister bookcase is furniture.

Get Adobe Flash player

Follow me

My Company