About Katebb


Website: http://www.katebrodock.com
Katebb has written 115 articles so far, you can find them below.


Letter to the City of Medford: Why can’t you think about customer service more?

Being a marketer, I often times find myself in situations where I sympathize with brands when they’re in tough marketing situations.

On the flip side, being a marketer sometimes makes me really intolerant of things like poor customer service, and my level of brand disgust is….perhaps…. more than it would be if I were just a regular ‘ole customer (not that I’m necessarily anything more than a regular ‘ole customer, but the viewpoint adds something to your experience).

Case in point: A completely unmoving, unreasonable and unsympathetic DMV.  I know I know, I’d be shocked if any one of you haven’t had a ridiculously annoying interaction with the DMV.

I just don’t get why there’s such a consistent disregard for even one element of customer service.  Things like, firstly, rationality.  From there, what about sensitivity, flexibility, even just a really sweet “Sorry honey, I know it stinks, but there’s nothing we can do. It would make my day if I could tell you otherwise.  Here are some tips for the future so this doesn’t happen again…. at the very least, I’ll see what I can do about the late fee on there….”

Nope, none of that.

So, after a tiring phone call with a DMV personnel, concerning my car which hadn’t entered the city of Medford all year and had been registered and insured in NY since last December and was now receiving a Medford city excise for plates that had been cancelled on January 3rd – none of which I understood because the whole thing is completely unreasonable – I attached the following letter to my payment.  I doubt they’ll read it, but it was a plea to just think about the job they’re doing….

15 June 2010

To Whom It May Concern:

I’m unclear as to why I need to pay this excise tax (including the incredible late fees!), even after speaking with someone in your office.

My car has been registered in New York State (where I now live) since December of 2009, and has been in the state of Massachusetts only a hand full of times since then for one day periods at a time  (with NYS plates on it).  Furthermore, as of November 2009, I’m no longer a resident of Medford, as I sold my condo and moved to New York.

Despite trying to get a logical explanation from someone concerning this issue, after additionally explaining that I hadn’t  received the initial request even remotely on time to my new address (thus, I was not able to pay it or deal with it), you were unwilling to offer even a single dollar off this amount (which simply makes no SENSE to me!).

At this point, I’ve been told I need to just pay up.  I expect nothing in return from your office, but I would like to suggest that just because you’re a government office, doesn’t mean you need to live up to the already poor reputation that most government offices are subject to in terms of customer service.  You should be able to offer some sort of leniency in issues that just don’t make ANY logical or rational sense (which your office personnel readily admitted to).

Unfortunately, when you don’t, you leave a bad taste in the mouths of the people that you’re supposed to be affecting positively.

I spent many years in Medford, and it really stinks that my last impression of the Medford brand is how insensitive the government bureaucracy was in this case.  It might do you well to start thinking like a marketer and realize that your number one audience is your citizens.  While you need them to follow a certain set of rules and guidelines, and they should be expected to give you something in return, you also need them to appreciate you and feel as if you respect them and are working for them. The excessive nature of your “punishment” does NOT do that.

So, I’ve enclosed my cheque for $53.75 for a car that is no longer in your town, plus a total of $32.00 in unnecessary “warrant,” “demand,” and “warrant notice” fees (have fun at your summer BBQ at my expense, since I can’t understand where else these fees would go).  Oh, I forgot the $0.99 final slap in the face for “interest.”

Sincerely,

Kate Brodock

Enhanced by Zemanta

Digital Activism Decoded: Book available for download!

Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change is now available for download on the Meta-Activism Project website!

The hard copy will be available June 30th at  Amazon.com (You can pre-order it if you’d like to).

Be sure to also check our blog, as we have been and will continue to be posting chapter excerpts.

Table of Contents

Preface….. by Mary Joyce
Introduction: How to Think About Digital Activism….. by Mary Joyce

Part 1: Contexts: The Digital Activism Environment

Infrastructure: Its Transformations and Effect on Digital Activism….. by Trebor Scholz
Applications: Picking the Right One in a Transient World….. by Dan Schultz and Andreas Jungherr
Devices: The Power of Mobile Phones….. by Brannon Cullum
Economic and Social Factors: The Digital (Activism) Divide….. by Katharine Brodock
Political Factors: Digital Activism in Closed and Open Societies….. by Tom Glaisyer

Part 2: Practices: Digital Actions in the Aggregate
Activism Transforms Digital: The Social Movement Perspective….. by Anastasia Kavada
Digital Transforms Activism: The Web Ecology Perspective….. by Tim Hwang
Destructive Activism: The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Tactics….. by Steven Murdoch

Part 3: Effects: What Is Digital Activism’s Value?
Measuring the Success of Digital Campaigns….. by Dave Karpf
The New Casualties: Prisons and Persecution….. by Simon Columbus
Digital Politics as Usual….. by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
The Future of Advocacy in a Networked Age….. by Sem Devillart and Brian Waniewski

Conclusion: Building the Future of Digital Activism….. by Mary Joyce
Glossary….. by Talia Whyte and Mary Joyce
About the Authors

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Chapter Excerpt: How Digital Activism Empowers Existing Elites

Countries based on World Bank income groupings...
Image via Wikipedia

Yesterday we posted an excerpt of the chapter I wrote for our new book on MAP, and below is an excerpt (See here for original post).

NOTE: On June 1st we’ll be posting a free downloadable copy of our new book Digital Activism Decoded and on July 1st the paper version will go on sale at Amazon.com. For the next two months we’ll be posting brief excerpts from all the chapters in the book. To learn more, visit our book page.

This chapter is entitled “Economic and Social Factors: The Digital (Activism) Divide”. The chapter describes how contextual factors beyond digital infrastructure can affect digital activism outcomes.

…Research indicates that economic differences limit not only access to technology but also the likelihood of an individual to take part in political activism. The 2009 Digital Activism Survey conducted by DigiActive, an organization dedicated to helping grassroots activists around the world use digital technology, found that digital activists, particularly in developing countries, are more likely than the population at large to be paying a monthly fee for home Internet access, to be able to afford a high-speed connection, and to work in a white-collar job with access to the Internet in the workplace.

In short, digital activists are likely to be prosperous, with their economic resources offering them a significant digital advantage. These initial findings indicate that the digital divide strongly influences digital activism because it tends to limit participation to the economic elite.

This research was corroborated by a report of the Internet and American Life Project of the Pew Research Center. A September 2009 Pew report—Civic Engagement Online: Politics as Usual, by Aaron Smith—stated that “whether they take place on the Internet or off, traditional political activities remain the domain of those with high levels of income and education.” Smith continues, “Contrary to the hopes of some advocates, the Internet is not changing the socio-economic character of civic engagement in the United States. Just as in offline civic life, the well-to-do and well-educated are more likely than those less well off to participate in online political activities.”

The digital divide is also made wider by the fact that not only do lower-income populations have less access to digital technologies, they sometimes must pay more for them. For example, the 2007 ITU-UNCTAD World Information Society report stated that the cost of broadband as a percentage of the average monthly per capita wage was around 2 percent in high-income countries, whereas broadband costs in low-income countries were more than 900 percent of the average monthly per capita wage. Higher income populations are not only likely to receive the higher-quality products of modern communications technology and in greater supply, they often are able to purchase them at significantly lower relative cost.

Combined with the research on digital activism participants from DigiActive and the Pew Research Center, these findings indicate that digital technology often mirrors rather than undermines preexisting divides in economic resources. Digital technology provides new communication capacities, but it is people of higher economic capabilities who are best able to take advantage of them….

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

MAP Post: Seriously, is Digital Activism New, or it just the Same Old on Steroids?

In a post a few weeks ago, Mary started us down the path of “Ok, all this chatter about digital this and activism that.  What constitutes digital activism anyway?”  Obviously we’ve got to start thinking about this, or else MAP has no reason to exist, so let’s keep at it.  Mary said, very rightly so:

“For digital activism to be a new field, the addition of digital technology to activism practice must be a change of kind not just degree.”

Are we creating a different type of activism is the question we have in front of us.

I want to push this discussion further, because I think there’s some good stuff nestled in this concept of degree vs kind.

If we think about it simply, most uses of digital technologies are amplifying existing processes:

  • I can now reach 1000 people on Twitter with my 140 characters rather than the 50 I had on my email list serve.
  • Friends of friends on Facebook can now see my posting, and can pass it along with the click of a mouse, rather than just my friends viewing something static.
  • Geomapping technologies can now put me on my street, rather than in my by neighborhood.

And the examples go on.  But I want to argue that, in fact, by increasing the degree of many of these actions, a new kind is often being created.

For the full post – and my really awesome napkins drawings – head over to the MAP Blog.

How Foursquare could help digital activism and crisis situations

[This is in rough notes form....random thoughts, as a result of an email conversation.....]

It’s location-based right out of the gate

  • PRO: It does it for you, instead of needing to manually aggregate the info like some other tools, or tag it like in Twitter.
  • CON: in a situation of violence-based conflict, this may be detrimental if the “opposing side” can use this information to locate you.
  • Does this mean that perhaps Foursquare is best used in only disaster-based crisis situations?
  • Is there a way this problem can be addressed effectively?

Direct connection to contacts

  • Much easier to have exact information on location of your contacts.
  • Could help reconnect people during or after crisis.
  • Could help mobilize people effectively, both those affected and possibly aid workers.
  • Could help reach people for rescue/assistance etc
  • How many direct connections are needed for the tool to be helpful? (For instance, is it necessary to be actually connected to someone on Foursquare to do the above?)

Each post can be supplemented with commentary

  • More detailed information can accompany the more exact location details, obvious benefits…..

I think there are many more things to think about here, but it seems like a no-brainer to me.  Their platform can greatly increase the accuracy of the information available in these situations.  I don’t need to tell you about the importance of that information.

Question: Is Twitter an invention? What’s an invention in digital form?

If you’re anything like me, if you hear the words “I have a new invention!” you think of an object, of something you can hold.  And if you’ve been listening to the verbiage of the digital age, you probably haven’t heard the word “invention” thrown around much.

So my question: Are digital tools like Twitter and Facebook actually inventions? We know they’re companies now, they were once start-ups, they’ve gotten traditional types of funding that other start-ups have gotten.  We also know they call themselves services.

Are they inventions?

Much more importantly perhaps, what’s considered to be an invention in the digital world?  What about an invention vs invented something?  What is a “digital invention”? (Maybe we can collectively coin this term)

Would love to hear your thoughts on my random car ride question.

SXSW: How to Spark a Movement in the 21st Century#sxsw #sparkmovements

Panel: How to Spark a Movement in the 21st Century

Speaker: Scott Heiferman

Description: Technology connects us to each other as never before, making it easier to harness our collective power. Obama’s election and post-election Iran barely scratch the surface of what’s possible when people self-organize. Hear how to embrace this potential, and what it means for our future.

Usual movement call-to-action on web: Watch us, See us, Download us, Join us, Friend us, Follow us, Contact us, Visit us….. what about giving them something to do?  What about connecting them to each other?  This ends up being a false sense of membership.

Remember: Numbers of followers mean nothing. Fans and followers are not a movement, get them to self-organize, mobilize, act.  Distribute responsibility, not just info or tasks.

We’re all organizers now.  Watch what happens after they connect and share stories.

“Let’s” is a word used  a lot on these networks.  One of the keys is to be everywhere.

Portrait of a great movement:

“Heart of a movement is that they have universal distribution, local presence everywhere, is infinitely expandable, provides person care and contact, is a leadership factory, turns spectators into participators, consumers into contributors and an audience into an army.”

You must make followers powerful.

Step 1: Get followers & Fans around the mission

Step 2: Get them interacting online, globally

Step 3: Get them to meet up locally everywhere



Meta-Activism Project website is up live

The “alpha” Meta-Activism Project (MAP) website is up live now (very exciting!)….. I really love the snappy “It’s time to update activism strategy so it reflects our new digital reality.”

Really excited to be moving forward with this, with some wonderful folks.

My Definition of Digital Activism

I was asked recently in an exercise to write on a small piece of paper what I know about digital activism.  In an effort of conciseness, I developed the following equation for what factors go into a successful occurrence of digital activism.  Keep in mind, these are also organized based on the order in which they would – or should – happen, although the process can happen so quickly that it can be difficult to make the distinction between them.

Circumstance: There is a certain situation or problem whereby an individual, a group or an organization seeks to have their voice heard or their problem solved.  An example could be a repressive situation, a crisis, or a specific political cause.

Goals: From this circumstance and desire for a greater share-of-voice come the goals of the individual, group or organization identifies the goals or solutions to their situation/problem. What do they ultimately hope to achieve? It’s at this point that the circumstances  are such that someone or a group of people decide they’re going to take action.

Strategy: As expected, once you’ve established your goals, most of the successful campaigns have a big-picture strategy that was developed during the process.

Technology: Once the above landscape is made clearer, a digital technology or technologies are identified as being the most useful and capable to implement.  This decision can be made base don various factors: what’s used most, what infrastructure is in place, what level of “reach” the tool has, etc.

Tactics: This is when you get down to the detailed way in which you’re going to use the technologies/technologies to get to your end goal.

It’s important to note in this model where the technology decision is made.  The thing is, this isn’t always how instances of digital activism come about.  Sometimes it’s a mix of all of these at once, sometimes it seems like things “transpire” organically because there’s a certain technology available.

However, at some level (whether the process seems organic or not), this choice of tool comes after some assessment of the landscape and identification of the problem and development of goals, and after the decision is made to take action.

Page 6 of 12« First...«456789»10...Last »

Feed me!

What I thought

Catch me speaking

SXSWi - 12 March, 12:30-1:30, Austin TX

Innovation Uncensored by Fast Company - 18 April, NYC

Check out our book!




Obviously you were wondering what time it was....

Widget By S107 Helicopter

Get Adobe Flash player

Follow me

My Company