A synopsis of the social media impact on the protests in Moldova that occurred in early April 2009.

source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/creepysleepy/3429118253/
Since Tuesday’s protests and riots in the Moldovan capital Chisinau, there has been much analysis on how this group of protesters was formed. Initial reports focused primarily on the use of Twitter, while paying scant reference to other social media tools, let alone the still relevant power of human mobilization. The extent to which Twitter has been connected to the event has even led to unfortunate outcomes such as the charging of Natalia Morar, a Moldovan activist blamed for starting the “revolution” using the application.
The analysis on the technological aspects of this event in the past few days have revealed a different story. It still involves Twitter, but Twitter has a different role. While Twitter had a part in the pre-protest mobilization in and around Chisinau on Monday night, it may not have necessarily turned the protests into mobs or rioters, nor did it necessarily invoke the violence that occurred on Tuesday, as some believe.
Visit the DigiActive blog for the full post.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=bb35f9fb-471d-4768-8059-4a611a4b3d29)





Pingback: One Year Later: The Arab Spring aftermath offers insight into trends and shifts in global digital activism | The Meta-Activism Project